Issue No. Nov/2024/01

Issue No. Nov/2024/01

Issue No. Nov/2024/01

RATIO OF LATEST JUDGEMENT

Shakti Polyfab Pvt. Ltd. Vs The State of Gujarat & Others (R/Special Civil Application No. 8168 of 2024) (Gujarat High Court)

The Hon’ble High Court has found that the order was passed without issuing show cause notice nor any reasons were served, thereby, following the command of “the Principle of Effective Communication” and “the Principle of Natural Justice”, the Hon’ble High Court has quashed the impugned order in FORM GST DRC-07. The matter was remanded back for proper consideration and for de novo adjudication after providing opportunity of being heard to the Petitioner.

 

Fairest Media Limited Vs Sales Tax Officer Class II Avato Ward 97, Zone 9 (W.P.(C) 14419/2024) (DELHI HIGH COURT)

The Hon’ble High Court has held that the order passed by the proper officer is ex-facie wholly unreasoned and unsustainable as the proper officer has failed to consider the reply filed and has also ignored the adjournment prayer made by the Petitioner. Therefore, Hon’ble High Court quashed the order passed.

 

Gujarat Co-operative Milk Marketing Federation Limited Vs Sales Tax Officer Class II /AVATO and Anr. (W.P.(C) 13103/2024 CM APPL. 54766/2024) (Delhi High Court)

The Hon’ble High Court has pointed out that the Assessing Officer has passed the impugned order just before the expiry of the limitation period without considering the reply furnished by the petitioner against the SCN. The Hon’ble Court has shown strong reservation against the practice of remanding back of the matter as the same has the effect of providing further time of two years to adjudicate the SCN thereby effectively frustrating the legislative provisions stipulating the period of limitation for adjudicating the assessments.

The Hon’ble High Court has set aside the demand order and however remanded back the matter to the adjudicating authority on the request of the Counsel for the Respondent to consider the matter afresh and specifically ordered to complete the matter within six months.

 

Ram Niwas Vs Commissioner of Central Goods and Services Tax and Anr. (W.P.(C) 13450/2024) (Delhi High Court)

The Hon’ble High Court has pointed that the foundation of the proceeding while issuing the SCN was defective as the same has no name of the officer or place for personal hearing, which infringes the right of opportunity of being heard for Noticee as well as no reason for the cancellation of registration was provided. Therefore, signifying the importance of Principle of Natural Justice the impugned order being completely silent thus, set aside.

Hriday Kumar Das Vs State of West Bengal and Ors. (FMA/1168/2024) (Calcutta High Court)

The Hon’ble High Court determined that the Appellate Authority’s decision to enhance the tax liability under Section 107(11) of the CGST Act, 2017 was unjustifiable, as the Appellate Authority failed to adhere to the requisite procedures established under the CGST Act. Accordingly, the Hon’ble High Court held that the Appellate Authority’s order was legally unsustainable and warranted reversal of the enhanced tax liability.

CIRCULARS ISSUED BY CBIC

 

Circular No. 237/31/2024-GST dated 15/10/2024

Recent amendments to Section 16 of the CGST Act have introduced some important changes that affect how taxpayers and authorities handle past cases involving the wrong availment of Input Tax Credit (ITC), particularly in relation to contraventions of Section 16(4). The different scenarios are placed as follows: –

  1. No Demand Notice Issued: For cases where investigations into ITC violations have started but no formal demand notice has been issued, authorities must now consider the new provisions under sub-sections (5) and (6) of Section 16, allowing eligible taxpayers to claim ITC.
  2. Demand Notice Issued, No Order: If a demand notice has been issued but no adjudicatory order is made, the authority must acknowledge the new amendments when passing their decision.
  3. Order Issued, Appeal Filed: In cases where an order has been made and an appeal is pending, the appellate authority should consider the retrospective changes in their assessment.
  4. Revisional Authority Proceedings: Similar considerations apply to cases under revisional authority proceedings where no order has been issued; the new provisions must be taken into account.
  5. Orders Issued, No Appeal Filed: Taxpayers with confirmed demands who haven’t filed an appeal can rectify their situation under the special procedure outlined in Notification No. 22/2024, applicable within six months.

Procedure for Filing Applications for Rectification:

  • Eligibility: Taxpayers whose ITC claims were denied due to Section 16(4) violations can apply for rectification under the new provisions {Section 16(5) or (6)} via the GST portal.
  • Application Process: Applications must include specific details about the denied claims and be submitted electronically. Original officers will process these requests within 3 months.
  • Adverse Effects: If a rectification negatively impacts a taxpayer, they are entitled to be heard before any adverse orders are issued, and they can appeal if necessary.
  • Limitations: The special rectification process is strictly for cases involving Section 16(4) contraventions. Applications outside this scope will be rejected.

CIRCULARS ISSUED BY CBIC

Circular No. 237/31/2024-GST dated 15/10/2024

Recent amendments to Section 16 of the CGST Act have introduced some important changes that affect how taxpayers and authorities handle past cases involving the wrong availment of Input Tax Credit (ITC), particularly in relation to contraventions of Section 16(4). The different scenarios are placed as follows: –

1. No Demand Notice Issued: For cases where investigations into ITC violations have started but no formal demand notice has been issued, authorities must now consider the new provisions under sub-sections (5) and (6) of Section 16, allowing eligible taxpayers to claim ITC.

2. Demand Notice Issued, No Order: If a demand notice has been issued but no adjudicatory order is made, the authority must acknowledge the new amendments when passing their decision.

3. Order Issued, Appeal Filed: In cases where an order has been made and an appeal is pending, the appellate authority should consider the retrospective changes in their assessment.

4. Revisional Authority Proceedings: Similar considerations apply to cases under revisional authority proceedings where no order has been issued; the new provisions must be taken into account.

5. Orders Issued, No Appeal Filed: Taxpayers with confirmed demands who haven’t filed an appeal can rectify their situation under the special procedure outlined in Notification No. 22/2024, applicable within six months.

Procedure for Filing Applications for Rectification:

Eligibility: Taxpayers whose ITC claims were denied due to Section 16(4) violations can apply for rectification under the new provisions {Section 16(5) or (6)} via the GST portal.

Application Process: Applications must include specific details about the denied claims and be submitted electronically. Original officers will process these requests within 3 months.

Adverse Effects: If a rectification negatively impacts a taxpayer, they are entitled to be heard before any adverse orders are issued, and they can appeal if necessary.

Limitations: The special rectification process is strictly for cases involving Section 16(4) contraventions. Applications outside this scope will be rejected.

CIRCULAR NO. 238/32/2024-GST DATED 15/10/2024

Clarifications relating to waiver of interest or penalty, or both related to demands under Sec 73

The CBIC has issued important circular addressing the retrospective amendments to Section 16 of the CGST Act and the waiver of interest or penalties related to demands under Section 73 for the financial years 2017-18, 2018-19, and 2019-20. This is based on the recommendations of the GST Council and the newly introduced of Section 128A, introduced by the Finance Act (No. 2) of 2024.

Application Filing:

For cases without orders: Use FORM GST SPL-01 electronically via the GST portal.

For cases with orders: Use FORM GST SPL-02.

Filing Time Limits:

Applications must be submitted within three months from March 31, 2025.

For notices reassessed under Section 73, applications are due within six months from the proper officer’s re-determination.

Withdrawal of Appeals:

Taxpayers must withdraw any pending appeals or writ petitions before filing a waiver application, providing proof of withdrawal with their application.

Waiver Eligibility:

Payments made before or after the effectiveness of Section 128A count as long as they are by the notified date, and amounts collected by tax officers before this date also count. Waivers apply only to full payments of the demanded tax; partial payments and any recovered interest or penalties are not eligible. The waiver is limited to specific tax periods, excluding erroneous refund claims, and any additional liabilities imposed after an appeal must be paid within three months. Transitional credit demands raised under Section 73 are also eligible for waiver.

 

GST PORTAL – NEWS & UPDATES

Important advisory for GSTR-9/9C

Starting F.Y. 2023-24, GST system will auto-populate eligible ITC for domestic supplies (excluding reverse charge and imports ITC) from Table 3(I) of GSTR-2B to Table 8A of GSTR-9. These changes in GSTR-9 and 9C for the FY 2023-24 will be available on the GST portal from 15th October 2024 onwards.

A validation utility will be executed progressively (for validation by taxpayers) to complete the auto population of GSTR-9 from GSTR-2B for Apr-23 till Mar-24.

Attention – Locking of auto-populated liability in GSTR-3B

To make tax filing easier and reduce errors, the GST Network (GSTN) has improved the process by introducing a pre-filled GSTR-3B Form. This Form automatically populates tax liabilities from the supplier’s GSTR-1 and ITC claims from GSTR-2B, along with a detailed PDF for taxpayers. Taxpayers can now also correct any mistakes in their outward supplies via GSTR-1A before submitting GSTR-3B. Additionally, they can manage their inward supplies and ITC claims using the new Invoice Management System (IMS), where they can accept, reject, or mark supplies as pending. Starting January 2025, changes to the auto-populated tax liability in GSTR-3B will be restricted, so any necessary adjustments should be made through GSTR-1A. While locking of auto-populated ITC will happen later, a separate advisory will be issued once all IMS-related concerns are addressed.

Advisory on GST REG 07 (Registration compliance for buyers of metal scrap)

GSTN has introduced an update to facilitate the registration compliance for buyers of metal scrap through form GST REG-07. This update follows the new GST provisions for metal scrap buyers as outlined in the advisory issued on 13/10/2024.

Taxpayers in this category are required to select “Others” in Part B of Table 2 under the “Constitution of Business” section. A text box will appear where the taxpayer must enter “Metal Scrap Dealers.” This entry is mandatory for those selecting the “Others” option. Once this is completed, the remaining details in form GST REG-07 should be filled and submitted on the common portal to meet the registration requirements as per Notification No. 25/2024 – Central Tax, dated October 9, 2024.

DUE DATES

LAST DATE TO ISSUE GST SHOW CAUSE NOTICE & ORDER

FOR F.Y. 2017-18 TO F.Y. 2023-24

TAX PERIOD (F.Y.)

DUE DATE OR EXTENDED DATE OF ANNUAL RETURN

NON-FRAUD CASES u/s 73 of CGST

FRAUD CASES u/s 74 of CGST

NOTICE

ORDER

NOTICE

ORDER

3 MONTHS BEFORE ORDER

WITHIN 3 YRS OF DUE DATE OF ANNUAL RETURN

NOTICE 6 MONTHS BEFORE ORDER

WITHIN 5 YRS OF DUE DATE OF ANNUAL RETURN

2017-18

05 February 2020

30-Sep-2023

(Time barred)

31-Dec-2023 (Time barred)

05-Aug-2024

(Time barred)

05 February 2025

2018-19

31 December 2020

31-Jan-2024

(Time barred)

30-Apr-2024 (Time barred)

30 June 2025

31 December 2025

2019-20

31 March 2021

31-May-2024

(Time barred)

31-Aug-2024 (Time barred)

30 September 2025

31 March 2026

2020-21

28 February 2022

30-Nov-2024

(Approaching)

28 February 2025

31 August 2026

28 February 2027

LEGAL MAXIMS/ PHRASES

 

Legal Maxim/ Phrase

Legal Principle/ Concept

Estoppel

Prevented from denying.

Ex parte

Proceedings in the absence of the other party.

Ex gratia

As a favour.

Ex officio

Because of an office held.

Ex post facto

Out of the aftermath. Or after the fact.

Ejusdem generis

 

 

Denoting a rule for interpreting statutes and other writings by assuming that a general term describing a list of specific terms denotes other things that are like the specific elements or as the same kind.

Disclaimer: Pursuant to the Bar Council of India rules, we are not permitted to solicit work and advertise. You, the reader acknowledges that there has been no advertisement, personal communication, solicitation, invitation or inducement of any sort whatsoever from us or any of our members to solicit any work through this newsletter. The information provided in this newsletter is solely available at your request and is for informational purposes only, it should not be interpreted as soliciting or advisement. We are not liable for any consequence of any action taken by the reader relying on material/ information provided in the newsletter. In cases where the reader has any legal issues, he/she must in all cases seek independent legal advice. Any information obtained or materials used from this newsletter is completely at the reader’s volition and any transmission, receiptor use of the contents of this newsletter would not create any lawyer-client relationship.

Shopping Cart

No products in the cart.

Disclaimer  The rules of the Bar Council of India prohibit law firms from advertising and soliciting work through communication in the public domain. This website is meant solely for the purpose of information and not for the purpose of advertising. Sharnam Legal does not intend to solicit clients through this website. We do not take responsibility for decisions taken by the reader based solely on the information provided in the website. By clicking on ‘ENTER’, the visitor acknowledges that the information provided in the website (a) does not amount to advertising or solicitation and (b) is meant only for his/her understanding about our activities and who we are. By continuing to use this site you consent to the use of cookies on your device as described in our  Cookie Policy